It is true that our tools and the DoubleChanceBetting.com method, if correctly applied, can put the user in a position to hit multipliers
sometimes with odds even higher than 10 but at the same time our line of thought is more or less contrary to the so-called "shopping lists", while we suggest to our
users a more professional approach, selecting 3 or 4 games at most so as to be able to reach a double and gradually grow their capital.
Let's look at a concrete example together:
On July 22nd, our schedule presented a series of scheduled matches and our attention fell on three of them, because after a careful analysis
they offered us a certain safety margin such that we could select them for the composition of a multiple bet for doubling. Let's see why:
The first of these three matches belongs to the Pepsideild championship of Iceland and sees Harnarfjordur - IA Akranes face off (See image below). The schedule presents it to us as a Bronze
"Star" match, that is, with all the Algo-Bettors agreeing to propose a 1X except the AG who instead suggests a No Bet. Let's go into detail and see in the box
at the bottom right that the success percentage of the first two algorithms, OF and CF is quite high, well over 90%. Moving on to analyze the graph, we can note that
the latter does not assume noteworthy configurations, except for the common point between the 2 line and the X line that can predict a draw. In these cases
we can therefore proceed with the selection of signs through the principle of dropping odds and/or from the lowest to the highest odds. In this case, the one who collapses is the
X sign, the lowest odds are that of one, therefore we can confirm the 1X suggested by the algo bettors.
The second match belongs to the Primera B Metropolitana Argentina and is played between CA Fenix - Argentino de Quilmes. At first glance we see only the RA algorithm expressing itself
with a 12 while all the others suggest No Bet but we know that all the matches must be studied, and there is no algo-bettors who is better than the others but only
more cautious than the others, due to the filters that we have learned about in the previous posts, so let's go into the details of the match and see that the
RA algorithm does not have an exciting success rate for this championship but looking at the graph we immediately recognize the typical configuration of the three lines that tend to
join in a single point. As reported in our user manual in these cases the hypothesis of a draw is unlikely, the study of the graph leads us to endorse the prediction
12 of the RA algorithm.
The third match also belongs to the Primera B Metropolitana Argentina and sees Villa Dalmine against Uai Urquiza. The schedule tells us that it is not a star-studded match
but the first 4 algo-bettors agree in saying 1X. Let's go into detail and see here too the success percentages are not exactly exciting for the algorithms
that expressed themselves in predictions but before drawing hasty conclusions let's analyze the graph and notice that it does not show a configuration of those recurring ones
but a conspicuous dropping odd of the X sign while the principle of the Down to Up selection is the second clue that leads us to agree with what our algorithms propose.
As you have seen, our tools allow us to do a brief but careful analysis of the matches and teach us that we should never discard a football match after first impression,
remember in fact that all matches are useful for making money if you have a good analysis method. See you next time!
Contacts
For any further information, clarification, requests for collaboration, of a commercial nature or technical support, contact us at the following e-mail addresses: